Document DateTime dialog field timezone and manual entry#8892
Document DateTime dialog field timezone and manual entry#8892
Conversation
…l entry (v11.6.0) Add capability note to the Interactive Dialogs description in the incoming webhooks integrations guide, documenting the new DateTime field features available from Mattermost server v11.6.0: configurable IANA timezone display (with timezone label shown in the picker) and optional manual time entry for exact typed times. Co-authored-by: Combs7th <[email protected]>
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughDocumentation update to Interactive Dialogs in Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
@sbishel - Do the above doc updates look accurate to you? |
|
Newest code from mattermost has been published to preview environment for Git SHA c74b63b |
|
Newest code from mattermost has been published to preview environment for Git SHA 3a8f121 |
|
@esethna - Ready for merge. |
esethna
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@Combs7th can we review this with the "Novice Nate" persona? I think Nate would be confused about what this means.
Similarly, "Editor Evie" might not like the sentence structure.
Personas: https://github.com/mattermost/docs/tree/master/.cursor/rules
|
@claude - Please give this review another pass through the lenses of our reviewer personas Novice Nate and Editor Evie. |
|
Claude finished @Combs7th's task in 1m 14s —— View job Review through Novice Nate and Editor Evie personas
Here's the added sentence under review:
Novice Nate's LensNate is a self-taught IT admin who doesn't write code. A few things here would leave him confused:
Editor Evie's LensEvie would flag a few issues here:
Suggested Revision- `Interactive Dialogs <https://developers.mattermost.com/integrate/plugins/interactive-dialogs/>`_: Guide users to successful outcomes when interactions need structured input or confirmation (for example, "Acknowledge with note" or "Assign to user"). Improve data quality with required fields, minimum/maximum input lengths, server-driven user/channel pickers, validated defaults, inline field errors, placeholders, and help text that help users enter the right data the first time. From v11.6.0, ``DateTime`` fields support two additional options: a configurable display timezone using an IANA timezone name (such as ``America/New_York``), which labels the picker with the configured timezone, and optional manual time entry so users can type exact times instead of selecting from preset dropdown intervals.Key changes:
|
|
@esethna - Do you think that's better now? |
|
Newest code from mattermost has been published to preview environment for Git SHA ccdd975 |
Adds a capability note to the Interactive Dialogs description in the incoming webhooks integrations guide, documenting the new DateTime field features available from Mattermost server v11.6.0: configurable IANA timezone display (with timezone label shown in the picker) and optional manual time entry for exact typed times.
Closes #8890
Generated with Claude Code