Skip to content

SCIM jit edits#24600

Open
akristen wants to merge 26 commits intodocker:mainfrom
akristen:scim-jit-edits
Open

SCIM jit edits#24600
akristen wants to merge 26 commits intodocker:mainfrom
akristen:scim-jit-edits

Conversation

@akristen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@akristen akristen commented Apr 1, 2026

just a lot of stuff that got out of hand idk. it started out as a nice reorg of provision and turned into a nightmare of my own making

@akristen akristen self-assigned this Apr 1, 2026
@akristen akristen added the area/admin Relates to Docker Admin label Apr 1, 2026
@netlify
Copy link
Copy Markdown

netlify bot commented Apr 1, 2026

Deploy Preview for docsdocker ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit d5d4513
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/docsdocker/deploys/69e2a29bac90e80008e54852
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-24600--docsdocker.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

akristen added 3 commits April 1, 2026 10:59
…ce it contained two topics; moved domain management into provision since sso has its own instructions in setup
@akristen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

akristen commented Apr 1, 2026

/review

@docker-agent
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

docker-agent bot commented Apr 1, 2026

PR Review Failed — The review agent encountered an error and could not complete the review. View logs.

Comment thread content/manuals/enterprise/security/single-sign-on/FAQs/troubleshoot-sso.md Outdated
Comment thread content/manuals/enterprise/security/provisioning/scim/_index.md
@dvdksn
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

dvdksn commented Apr 2, 2026

/review

docker-agent[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

@akristen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

akristen commented Apr 9, 2026

/review

docker-agent[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

@akristen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

akristen commented Apr 9, 2026

/review

docker-agent[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

docker-agent[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

@akristen akristen requested a review from aevesdocker April 9, 2026 18:44
Use Hugo source paths with .md or _index.md for cross-references from admin
overview, organization pages, and company users. Align SSO, SCIM, roles,
enforce sign-in, Settings Management, domains, billing paths, and related
targets with content/manuals layout.

Made-with: Cursor
Point billing FAQs, payment method, 3D Secure, and tax certificate cross-links
to Hugo source paths under content/manuals/billing and subscription.

Made-with: Cursor
Point Create a Docker ID to content/manuals/accounts/create-account.md.

Made-with: Cursor
Use /manuals/admin/company/_index.md for Hugo ref resolution.

Made-with: Cursor
akristen and others added 4 commits April 13, 2026 11:12
Use /manuals/... and /reference/api/hub/latest.md paths for Hugo ref
resolution on JIT, provision-scim, and migrate-scim.

Made-with: Cursor
Use /manuals/ paths for security announcements, access tokens, JIT, FAQs,
and troubleshoot; /reference/api/hub/latest.md for Hub API; repair
security-announcements URL typo and Markdown link punctuation in
troubleshoot-sso.

Made-with: Cursor
Point domain and SSO connect anchors to /manuals/...; align CLI reference
links with /reference/cli/...md forms used elsewhere in manuals.

Made-with: Cursor
@akristen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/review

@akristen akristen removed the request for review from aevesdocker April 13, 2026 16:31
docker-agent[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

Point SCIM section links at scim/_index.md instead of nonexistent scim.md.
Route supported-attributes anchor to provision-scim.md. Fix group mapping
link in admin user management guide to use /manuals/... path.

Made-with: Cursor
@akristen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/review

docker-agent[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

docker-agent[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

@akristen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/review

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@docker-agent docker-agent bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Assessment: 🔴 CRITICAL

PR: SCIM jit edits — SCIM/SSO/provisioning docs reorganization (44 files)

Severity Finding File
🔴 HIGH SSO requires: version stripped to bare string data/summary.yaml:265
🟡 MEDIUM Old redirect alias /security/troubleshoot/troubleshoot-provisioning/ dropped troubleshoot-provisioning.md:9
🟡 MEDIUM Inconsistent 'Roles and permissions' link targets (line 36 vs line 109) admin/company/users.md:36

3 findings in changed code. The HIGH finding affects user-facing version requirement display on all SSO documentation pages.

Comment thread data/summary.yaml
subscription: [Business]
for: Administrators
requires: Docker Desktop [4.42](/manuals/desktop/release-notes.md#4420) and later
requires: Docker Desktop
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[HIGH] SSO requires: field stripped of version number

The requires: entry for SSO was changed from:

requires: Docker Desktop [4.42](/manuals/desktop/release-notes.md#4420) and later

to:

requires: Docker Desktop

This drives the {{< summary-bar >}} shortcode on SSO documentation pages. Other entries in summary.yaml that have no minimum version requirement omit the requires: field entirely — they don't use a bare requires: Docker Desktop string. The bare string is anomalous and will render an incomplete/misleading version badge for users. If the 4.42 requirement is still valid, this is a regression. If SSO no longer requires a minimum Desktop version, the field should be removed entirely rather than left as a bare product name.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@aevesdocker I'll follow your lead here. I dropped it in summary.yaml per your feedback, but looks like the bot is getting fussy about it

Comment thread content/manuals/enterprise/security/provisioning/troubleshoot-provisioning.md Outdated
Comment thread content/manuals/admin/company/users.md
@akristen akristen requested review from aevesdocker and removed request for craig-osterhout April 17, 2026 20:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/admin Relates to Docker Admin

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants